Apollo made it on to Slashdot the other day and was immediately lit up by the natives. I usually stay out of this stuff, but lately the level of ignorance towards all ActionScript based tools (Flash/Flex and now Apollo) is drivin’ me nuts.
For ten years I’ve listened to people crap all over Flash. Then the very same people turned around and wet their pants as soon as they could do Flash like things with AJAX (probably just lost my Rails audience with that one). The latest release of script.aculo.us implements some MP3 playback, possibly via Flash, and they get a case of the vapors:
You’re missing the point. We don’t WANT to use flash. Why bother with
script.aculo.us at all otherwise? Flash can do animations and ajax-
like functions as well.
Ding, ding, ding we have a winner, your prize is a new nose to replace the one you cut off to spite your face.
Extremists be they in any area from politics to web development are ‘programmed’ to cheer for their team rather than the best solution. Which is how any discussion on slashdot of a non open source project devolves into the merits of the GIMP:
People are just looking for an excuse not to use Linux, so they say Photoshop. Most home users don’t need photoshop, probably haven’t paid for it, and could do just as well with GIMP. For professional graphic artists, I guess can see a need for Photoshop, but those are the extreme minority of users. Even some professionals could probably get by with only using GIMP. I don’t think that having Photoshop on Linux would do anything to increase the number of people using linux. People who say they need photoshop are just looking for something to complain about.
If you can’t see that Photoshop beats the GIMP, well like a gimp, is the same reason you can’t see the potential of web apps on the desktop.
They’ll wail away on Apollo because it’s new and scary, but just like they came around to Rich Internet Apps when someone built Prototype for them, they’ll come around to web apps on the desktop once we show’em how it’s done.
GIMPs!